Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Taylor v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Sue Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc , Zimmer U S Inc , Zimmer Production Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Dunn et al
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Taylor and Carolyn Sue Taylor
Defendant:
Amy Dunn, Barbara Hathaway, Johnson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Janice Taylor
as 11-10069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR, AKA Sue J. Taylor
Taylor et al v. Johnson County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Taylor and Carolyn Sue Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson County, Tennessee, Michael Reece, Edward Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C v. Land Bienville Parish et al
as 3:2010cv00570
Plaintiff:
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
Ronnie Drew Flanagan, Bobby Charles Flanagan, Linda Sue Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Taylor v. Keeton
as 1:2009cv00445
Petitioner:
Janice Sue Taylor
Respondent:
Charles Keeton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Keeton
as 1:2009cv00386
Petitioner:
Janice Sue Taylor
Respondent:
Charles Keeton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Janice Taylor v. USDC-AZP
as 08-75072
:
In re: JANICE SUE TAYLOR
Petitioner:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: David Taylor, et al v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 08-60033
Debtor:
In re: DAVID DOUGLAS TAYLOR and LINDA SUE TAYLOR
Appellant:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Appellee:
DON THACKER, Trustee
Taylor v. Cody et al
as 2:2007cv02095
Petitioner:
Sue Taylor
Respondent:
Samuel Cody and Charles Gilkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
