Cases 31 - 38 of 38
SKINNER v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 2:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
STEWART L SKINNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CORY KNOWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Melvin Marin v. Tom Leslie, et al
as 08-4018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, ARTISIA FOSTER and TOM LESLIE
ROCKWELL v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2008cv00118
Petitioner:
CHARLES R. ROCKWELL
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, TENNESSEE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KARNES v. PATRICK et al
as 2:2008cv00495
Petitioner:
ROGER JOEL KARNES
Respondent:
GEORGE PATRICK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'NEAL v. STOWITZKY et al
as 2:2007cv01203
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKLIN O'NEAL
Respondent:
PAUL STOWITZKY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RASPATELLO v. THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
JOHN RASPATELLO
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, TAMMY WATERS and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KARNES v. PATRICK, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00364
Petitioner:
ROGER JOEL KARNES
Respondent:
GEORGE PATRICK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
