Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Tansey v. Joy Global Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01201
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tansey
Defendant:
Joy Global Inc , Edward L Doheny, II , Steven L Gerard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ranesha Whittle v. Terri Watkins, et al
as 16-5410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANESHA WHITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRI WATKINS, CASEY KIMBALL, ERIN KELLY and others
Whittle v. Watkins et al
as 3:2015cv00813
Plaintiff:
Ranesha Whittle
Defendant:
Terri Watkins, Casey Kimball, Erin Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santini et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jose Santini , Luz N Santini , Marcia Schlissel and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00187
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tansey et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv00406
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tansey and Patrick G Tansey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stirling International Realty, Inc. et al v. Soderstrom
as 6:2014cv01109
Plaintiff:
Stirling International Realty, Inc. and Roger Soderstrom
Defendant:
Tansey Soderstrom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Tansey v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02616
Plaintiff:
Diane Tansey
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houtven v. Adams
as 14-1657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Romana Van Houtven
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Adams, Detective, Judith Holler, SPA, George Codd, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
