Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Daniel Cobble v. City of Clarksville, Arkansas, et al
as 15-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Clarksville, Arkansas and Arkansas State Patrol
Daniel Cobble v. City of Clarksville, et al
as 15-1575
Petitioner - Appellant:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent - Appellee:
City of Clarksville, Arkansas and John Doe, Warden, Jail in Clarksville Arkansas
Grass et al v. Dial et al
as 5:2013cv00114
Defendant:
Wayne Dial and City of Clarksville, Texas
Plaintiff:
Gary Grass and Gary Martino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The State of Tennessee, et al v. Robert Irvin
as 13-6421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
The State of Tennessee et al v. Irvin
as 3:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
The State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, The City of Clarksville and others
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lisenbee v. City of Clarksville Gas & Water
as 3:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lisenbee
Defendant:
City of Clarksville Gas & Water
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chute et al v. Odom et al
as 3:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
David Edward Chute and Kathleen Patricia Chute
Defendant:
Jereme Odom , Cape Taylor , Tim Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
