Cases 31 - 40 of 306
MULLIS v. LASKA et al
as 1:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Defendant:
SARA LASKA and TONY LEE KUMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Tony Manning
Defendant:
Jayco Inc, Ford Motor Company and Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BEBOUT v. DELAWARE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEBOUT
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY JAIL and TONY SKINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAY TURNER, JOHNNY ANGEL, ANDREW STORIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADY v. DJGN INDY, LLC d/b/a TONY'S OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Austin Brady
Defendant:
DJGN INDY, LLC d/b/a Tony's of Indianapolis
MULLIS v. KUMMER et al
as 1:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Defendant:
TONY LEE KUMMER and COLUMBUS INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Walsh v. Uniquehab Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Martin J Walsh
Defendant:
UNIQUEHAB SOLUTIONS, LLC d/b/a UNIQUEHAB SOLUTIONS, JOHN MUSILI, TONY ADURO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DEGRAFEREED v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
TONY DEGRAFEREED
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOSEPH, SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
