Cases 31 - 40 of 46
JAMES v. U.S. BANK N.A.
as 4:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
KENYATTA TYRONE JAMES
Defendant:
U.S. BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARM, AND EXPLOSIVES (ATF) AGENCY et al
as 4:2012cv00050
Defendant:
JUSTIN C. DEMAREE, BRETT W. FINAL, CHARLEY A. SCARBER and others
Plaintiff:
KENYATTA TYRONE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Bowers v. USA
as 12-11861
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE JAMES BOWERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James v. Roberts, et al
as 11-3330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRON JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Director of the State of Kansas, in his individual and official capacity, SAM CLINE, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity, J. W. MARTIN, Correctional Officer, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
James v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03129
Plaintiff:
Tyron James
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Sam Cline, J. W. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv14199
Plaintiff:
Tyrone James Bowers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. Mellard
as 3:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Darrin Tyrone James
Defendant:
Edward Edmond Mellard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. USA
as 1:2010cv00412
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Tyrone James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ARCHIE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JAMES ARCHIE, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Anderson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02704
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Anderson, Emma J. Andrews, Ralph A. Baughman and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
