Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Akers v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jason Simmons, Jamie Conover, Kathy S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv02522
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv02526
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv02523
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swartz v. Dallas Department of Criminal et al
as 3:2022cv01809
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Swartz
Defendant:
Dallas Department of Criminal, Director, TDCJ-CID, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
William Jackson v. United States, et al
as 22-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Phillip Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and David A. Hubbert, Acting Assistant Attorney General Tax Division, US Dept. of Justice
Bayon v. Byron et al
as 5:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
Paul G. Byron, Elizabeth M. Warren, H Iovino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
