Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
County of Van Zandt v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as TXE/6:18-CV-00064
Plaintiff:
County of Van Zandt
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
County of Van Zandt v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as 6:2018cv00064
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of Van Zandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Easley v. Van Zandt County
as 2:2017cv00696
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Easley
Defendant:
Van Zandt County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Domicello v. Cronin et al
as 6:2017cv06432
Plaintiff:
Charles Salvatore Domicello
Defendant:
S. Cronin, Paula Dean, S. Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
KERAFIBER, LLC. v. VAN ZANDT et al
as 1:2017cv20127
Plaintiff:
KERAFIBER, LLC.
Defendant:
MELISSA VAN ZANDT and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
KNITTER v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JAMES E. VAN ZANDT VA MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN KNITTER, MD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JAMES E. VAN ZANDT VA MEDICAL CENTER and ROBERT MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Van Zandt County, Texas v. Midwest Portland, LLC
as 6:2016cv00461
Plaintiff:
Van Zandt County, Texas
Defendant:
Midwest Portland, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
