Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Perez v. Steel
as 21-40458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roberto Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Warden Edward B. Sells and Lieutenant Matthew S. Steel
Perez v. Steel et al
as 9:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Lieutenant Matthew S. Steel, Asst Warden Edward B. Sells, Warden Unknown Polk and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
WARDEN EDWARD TED PHILBIN, BRACEWELL, BRUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRACEWELL, BRUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Sells et al
as 5:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Asst Warden Edward B. Sells and Matthew Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Steel et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Lieutenant Matthew S. Steel and Asst Warden Edward B. Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Philbin et al
as 1:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
Freddie Hilton, William E. West, IV, Kawaski Bush and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Correction, Tamika Harvey, Warden Edward Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells et al v. Philbin et al
as 1:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
Joshua Westover, Michael Brandon Hill, Jeremy John Wells and others
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin, FNU Fluker, FNU Everet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cammack v. Sheldon
as 1:2020cv02056
Petitioner:
Jamal Cammack
Respondent:
Warden Edward Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Linder v. Sheldon
as 1:2020cv01667
Petitioner:
Charles E. Linder
Respondent:
Warden Edward Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
