Cases 31 - 40 of 2,373
CARRILLO v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv04531
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CARRILLO
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrillo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. American Airlines et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dwayne Lawson
Defendant:
American Airlines, Robert Isom, David Seymour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mellado-Alvizures, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1620
Petitioner:
MONICA ESMERAKLA MELLADO-ALVIZURES and ROSMERY MIRTALA CARRILLO-MELLADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Prior v. Carrillo et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Eddie Prior
Defendant:
Javier Cenorino Carrillo and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Ramon Alvarez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Department, The County of Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Carrillo Lopez De Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
LUCIA CARRILLO LOPEZ DE GARCIA, YESICA GARCIA CARRILLO, YEINER GARCIA CARRILLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
