Cases 31 - 40 of 405
Watkins et al v. Portis et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Kyle Watkins, Chief Eagle Eye and Katrina Watkins
Defendant:
Julianne Portis, Crittenden County Sheriff Department, West Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Young v. Spotify
as 4:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Joe Willis Young
Defendant:
Spotify
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Willis v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Telvin Rashad Willis
Defendant:
Phillip Green, Kyle Hunter and Clint Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Williams
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Susan Duffel, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Asha Kelly, Joseph Walker, Ashley Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Willis v. McGilton et al
as 4:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Willis
Defendant:
Dammon Joe McGilton, John Crisman and Stone County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovelace v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Wille C Lovelace and Willie C Lovelace, III
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Thomas
as 4:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Willis
Defendant:
Chynna Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morningstar v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Khanis-Orion Morningstar
Defendant:
Doc King, William Freeman, Richard Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Mills et al
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gavonna Willis
Defendant:
Juanita Mills and Helena-West Helena, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
