Cases 411 - 420 of 140,754
Lane v. City of Clarksburg
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Lane
Defendant:
City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Bell v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bell
Defendant:
Kennedy R. Bryant and Whitley Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stebbins v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Randall Richard Stebbins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Leon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Nestor Leon
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rojeski et al v. Master Moving, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rojeski and Ashelyn Rojeski
Defendant:
Master Moving, Inc. and Batia Zelig
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morris et al v. Jupiter Aluminum Corportaion et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Danika Paige Morris and Joshua Wayne Morris
Defendant:
Jupiter Aluminum Corportaion, George Reed and Michael Fair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
McGranahan v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.R. v. Shafer
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Defendant:
Chad Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Houston P. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Breech et al v. Ergon Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Deborah Breech and Audrey E. Grooms
Defendant:
Ergon Trucking, Inc. and Bruce Randall Stack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
