Cases 41 - 50 of 20,869
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FERGUSON v. MCDONALD'S
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JAMES FERGUSON, JR
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Mannie
as 24-6084
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR MORRIS MANNIE, JR.
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Yusupov et al
as 1:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company and others
Defendant:
Arthur Yusupov, Gaogui Leasing Corp, John Does 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoseth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Scott Arthur Hoseth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Arthur ArmstrongIn re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Hubner v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd
as 1:2024cv20927
Plaintiff:
Arthur HUBNER
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., A Liberian Corporation and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
