Cases 41 - 50 of 311
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McCoy et al v. United Seating & Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Carr Access, Inc, United Seating and Mobility, LLC doing business as Numotion, Covenant Health and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward McCoy, Jr and Sarah Mccoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Rogers
as 3:2021cv00027
Respondent:
Samuel Rogers
Petitioner:
Henry Floyd Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stinson v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2020cv02886
Defendant:
Archie Sanders and Ricky Wilkins
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Larkins et al
as 2:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Brian Sanders, Jesse Williams and Greg Larkins
Plaintiff:
Marcus Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
