Cases 41 - 50 of 765
Darnell Lewis v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16481
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL J. LEWIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
GOLLIDAY v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
TERRYON GOLLIDAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. LEWIS, DOUGLAS G. CARTER, ROBERT ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Chauncie J Lewis
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, E Fandel, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiante Scott v. Olga Beregovskay, et al
as 22-16064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIANTE DION SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
OLGA BEREGOVSKAY, M.D., A. SHITTU, M.D., Chief Physician & Surgeon, NDUKWE N. ODELUGA, M.D., Chief Med. Executive and others
Lewis v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2022cv00869
Plaintiff:
Gloria J. Lewis and Gloria J Lewis
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreen Co
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Raul Arellano v. Sedighi, et al
as 22-55310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
SEDIGHI, Doctor, R. WALKER, Chief Physician and Surgeon, S. ROBERTS, M.D.; Chief Medical Executive and others
Lewis v. Asbell
as 1:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Chauncie J Lewis
Respondent:
Brian Asbell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Lewis v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lewis
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01903
Plaintiff:
LEE J LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
