Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Quick Shop Deli Grocery et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01443
Plaintiff:
Nabil Al Zandani and Quick Shop Deli Grocery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2011 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Keesh v. Quick et al
as 1:2019cv09695
Defendant:
R. Williams, S.A. Coughlin, Salvatory P. Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Tyheem Y. Keesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orpilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
Michael Orpilla, Miguel Quinones, Peter Panariello and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Peterkin v. Quick Chill Food Services et al
as 1:2019cv07819
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscillo, Carl Koeningsman, Quick Chill Food Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kahene Peterkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Quick et al
as 6:2019cv06713
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION, Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Tri County Housing Council, A Non-Profit Housing Agency and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Keesh v. Quick et al
as 1:2019cv08942
Defendant:
R. Williams, S.A. Coughlin, Rebecca A. Loren and others
Plaintiff:
Tyheem Y. Keesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kneitel v. Rose et al
as 1:2019cv03742
Defendant:
Jane Doe, The City of New York, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kneitel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Quick et al
as 1:2019cv01208
Defendant:
C. Hiram and Diancira Quick
Plaintiff:
Richard Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abad et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frank Lipari, David Solorzano, Antonio Rosa and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
