Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Mabe v. Whitener et al
as 5:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Mabe
Defendant:
Keith Whitener, George Solomon and Ann Dalton
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shelly Dannielle Dalton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
BRUNSON v. USA
as 1:2012cv01134
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DALTON OSBURN BRUNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hopkins v. USA
as 3:2012cv00688
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dalton Dion Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bailey et al v. Polk County, North Carolina et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Max Bailey , Margaret Dalton , Carlton Bill Huntley and others
Defendant:
Polk County, North Carolina, Polk County Sheriff's Department, Matthew Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lilley v. Redmond et al
as 5:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr.
Defendant:
Phillip Redmond, Judy Dalton, FNU Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Louque et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00511
Plaintiff:
Rose S. Louque and Dalton Louque
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DALTON v. DIXSON et al
as 1:2009cv00383
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEE DALTON
Defendant:
PHILIP M. DIXSON and DERRICK H. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dalton et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robert Edgar Dalton and Mary E. Dalton
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dalton v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Dalton and Linda M. Dalton
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
