Cases 41 - 50 of 44,669
Michael et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Michael and Pamela S Michael
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Billings v. Overton et al
as 5:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Gregory Billings
Defendant:
William Overton, Wayne Johnson, Kimberly Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Cook v. Michelle Dunham, et al
as 24-1466
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE DUNHAM, GOA Mailroom, CARRIE KIENITZ, GOA Mailroom, SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden and others
David Martin v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-1915
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, GREGORY EMMETT AHERN, JR., COUNTY OF COOK and others
Ly v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ly
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, David Zinsner, James Goetz and others
T. et al v. Board of Education of the Pecos Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
D. T.
Defendant:
Board of Education of the Pecos Independent School District, Joshua Gregory Rico and Fred Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
