Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,836
SDW Ventures, LLC et al v. Payne
as 1:2024cv01716
Plaintiff: SDW Ventures, LLC and BSL Properties
Defendant: Malik Payne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Essential Media Group, LLC v. Payne
as 1:2024cv21485
Plaintiff: Essential Media Group, LLC
Defendant: Darryl Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff: Patrick L Sherman
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mitchell v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff: Michael Mitchell
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05226
Not Yet Classified: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: APRIL PAYNE
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Bobby Payne
as 24-5353
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BOBBY D. PAYNE
Pitts v. Payne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff: Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant: Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff: DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant: V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Payne v. Secretary Department Of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00911
Petitioner: Henry Payne
Respondent: Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?