Cases 41 - 50 of 359
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Polk v. Bell Unit Mailroom
as 4:2022cv04196
Plaintiff:
James Lee Polk
Defendant:
Bell Unit Mailroom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. General Shale Brick, Inc. dba Red River Brick
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Polk
Defendant:
General Shale Brick, Inc. dba Red River Brick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Polk v. United Group Logistics, Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tyler Polk
Defendant:
United Group Logistics, Inc. and Abdul Razzak Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moseley v. Polk et al
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Gary Moseley
Defendant:
O Balden Polk, Shannarcus Preston, Heather O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Polk et al
as 9:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Gary Moseley
Defendant:
O Balden Polk, Shannarcus Preston, Heather O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Castillo et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Poresha Sha-Faye Polk
Defendant:
Maria Castillo and Charles Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCray v. Polk et al
as 1:2022cv00796
Petitioner:
Endicott McCray
Respondent:
Balden Polk and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
