Cases 41 - 50 of 387
Barwick v. Broadway Lofts, et al
as 22-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARWYNN L. BARWICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BROADWAY LOFTS, LLC, PACIFICAP MANAGEMENT, ASHLEY WILLIAMS and others
Quinonez v. United States Postal Service
as 9:2022cv81432
Plaintiff:
Virginia Quinonez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Quinonez v. United States Of America
as 9:2022cv81435
Plaintiff:
Virginia Quinonez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
QUINONEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12177
Plaintiff:
SHEREL DONNY QUINONEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benjamin Freeman v. Douglas Ducey, et al
as 22-16090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS DUCEY, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADC, JOE PREFINI, Southern Reginal Operations Director and others
Perez Quinonez v. ARC ONE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv21989
Plaintiff:
Esteban Omar Perez Quinonez
Defendant:
ARC ONE PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC, Chance Ramos and Austin Wallace
Quinonez et al v. Does 1 through 5
as 3:2022cv03195
Plaintiff:
Ren Quionez, Movement Ink LLC and Rene Quinonez
Defendant:
Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quinonez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01588
Petitioner:
Leonardo Mendoza Quinonez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Leonardo Mendoza Quinonez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
James Quinonez
Respondent:
Hughes Unit and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
