Cases 41 - 50 of 902
Ottolin v. Jammify AI, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05183
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ottolin
Defendant:
Jammify AI, Inc. and Aarushi Wadwha
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chen v. Garland
as 23-8090
Petitioner:
AI FUNG CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Goel v. Sanas AI Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Surendra Goel
Defendant:
Sanas AI Inc., GOOGLE LLC and Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a AIS Healthcare
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Anne Milgram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tran v. Tom's Marine and Salvage, LLC
as 2:2023cv06789
Plaintiff:
Ai Van Tran
Defendant:
Tom's Marine and Salvage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Roush Industries Inc. v. Gatik AI Inc.
as 2:2023cv08782
Plaintiff:
Roush Industries, Inc. and Roush Industries Inc.
Defendant:
Gatik AI Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Ai v. Gillis et al
as 1:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Di Ai
Defendant:
Ian Terrance Gillis, Shoyeb Mohammed Ahmed, Raiser, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Cadence Bank v. GlobalVision Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09281
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank
Defendant:
GlobalVision Systems, Inc. and AI Oasis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Viking Wizard Eyes, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14562
Plaintiff:
Viking Wizard Eyes, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 1998 Art Store, 2019 Poster Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
