Cases 41 - 50 of 748
Lewis v. Hatley et al
as 4:2023cv04047
Plaintiff:
Don Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hatley, Deputy Sheriff Shaun Johnson, Captain G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maskell v. Spain
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Frank Spain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Spain
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Frank Spain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Harrod
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David Harrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Judge Bruce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Love, Jr. v. Merchant et al
as 4:2023cv04038
Plaintiff:
Christopher Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Merchant, Sheriff James Singleton, Captain James Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Holman et al
as 4:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniels
Defendant:
Adam B Holman and Joe Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jaquez v. Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 1 et al
as 4:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Jaquez
Defendant:
Faulkner County Detention Center Unit 1, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office, Terry Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv03025
Plaintiff:
Adam Watkins
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
