Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Los Angeles County Sheriff
as 2:2009cv05148
Plaintiff:
Amanda U Ajuluchuku-Levy
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Civil Rights
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Employment Development Department et al
as 2:2009cv05132
Plaintiff:
Amanda U Ajuluchuku-Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Ajuluchuku-Levy v. CVS Corporation
as 1:2008cv00538
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy
Defendant:
CVS Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Rescigno et al
as 2:2008cv07115
Defendant:
Tony Rescigno, James Ramaglino and Law Offices of R. Thomas Wire
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2005cv04548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Bank of America Corporation
as 3:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Bernard A. Rax et al
as 2:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Amanda U Ajuluchuku-Levy
Defendant:
Bernard A Rax and Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
AJULUCHUKU v. NNAKWE
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
AMANDA U. AJULUCHUKU
Defendant:
JUSTUS NNAKWE, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and BROOKLYN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION ALUMNI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AJULUCHUKU v. STACEY
as 1:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
AMANDA U. AJULUCHUKU
Defendant:
GEORGE MARK STACEY
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
