Cases 41 - 50 of 183
Robles v. L3Harris Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robles
Defendant:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc., L3 Technologies, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Billups-Larkin v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv06852
Plaintiff:
Tiara Billups-Larkin
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pedroza v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04419
Plaintiff:
Josephine Pedroza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Business & Industry, LLC, Aramark Business Facilities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush v. Aramark Services Inc
as 7:2021cv00829
Plaintiff:
Atasha Bush
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Eiland-Darboe v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03218
Defendant:
Aramark Refreshment Services, LLC, Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Matithia Eiland-Darboe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Alfonso v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv22149
Plaintiff:
Raoul A. Alfonso
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bader et al v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10769
Plaintiff:
Debra Beard-Bader and Christopher Bader
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saulsberry v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Lillian Saulsberry
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
