Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 244
AL-ZARNOUQI et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv01767
Petitioner: MOHAMED AL-ZARNOUQI, MASHOUR ABDULLAH MUQBEL ALSABRI, MOHAMED MUQBEL AHMED ALSABRI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, HARRY B. HARRIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
IN RE: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021mc00046
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN RE: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
as 1:2021mc00034
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00939
Plaintiff: Waymo LLC
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Ottomotto LLC, Otto Trucking LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: Colin Sebern, Ognen Stojanovski, Tyto LiDAR, LLC and others
Petitioner: Edward Russo, Nicholas Gicinto, Richard Jacobs and others
Intervenor: Bloomberg L.P., The Hearst Corporation, BuzzFeed, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Travis Kalanick and Slack, Inc.
Respondent: Stroz Friedberg, LLC
Special Master: John Lee Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
CUTLER v. PELOSI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00834
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS INC, MANHEIM SCHOOL DISTRICT, GOOGLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC, et al
as 1:2019mc00174
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC,
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES CO, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL T. FLYNN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Don Blankenship v. Bradley Blakeman
as 20-1886
Defendant: KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Defendant / Appellant: BRADLEY BLAKEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee: DON BLANKENSHIP
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, VOX MEDIA, LLC, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY and others
ABDULLAH et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv00023
Petitioner: HANI SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, YOSRA SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, RAMI BIN SAAD AL-OTEIBI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BH Media Group, Inc. v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1769
Plaintiff / Appellant: GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA, LLC, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, GANNETT COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 23 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?