Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Tavares v. Corry
as 1:2019cv00420
Respondent:
Warden L. Corry and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Victor A. Tavares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00334
Petitioner:
Pedro Reyes
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tavares v. RI Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Tavares
Defendant:
RI Superior Court, RI Office of the Attorney General and RI Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Bispo v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, Judge Haiganush Bedrosian, Hasbro Childrens Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Vera Lucia Alves Bispo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. McGann et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Timothy McGann, Kate Revens, James Baum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00076
Petitioner:
David W. Pope
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitaker v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00051
Petitioner:
KENDALL WHITAKER
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Neronha et al
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Peter F. Nerhona, Gina Raimondo and U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rodriguez v. Weeden
as 1:2019cv00013
Petitioner:
Wilton Rodriguez
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMES WEEDEN and James Weeden
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
