Cases 41 - 50 of 411
Aboites et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Aboites, Lois Allen, Carol Alsay and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aboites et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00829
Plaintiff:
Aboites, Susan Higgins, Cherilyn Aboites and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
No Casino in Plymouth, et al v. National Indian Gaming Commission, et al
as 22-15756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NO CASINO IN PLYMOUTH, DUEWARD W. CRANFORD II, ELIDA A. MALICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, JONODEV CHAUDHURI, Former NIGC Chairman, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
IONE BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
LEE v. BIA OFFICE OF PENSACOLA et al
as 3:2022cv03070
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MICHAEL ANTHONY LEE
Defendant:
BFA OFFICE PENSACOLA, BOARD OF HEALTH CLINIC PENSACOLA and BIA OFFICE OF PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
