Cases 41 - 50 of 84
BORGER MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01958
Defendant:
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BORGER MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Christopher Bridgeman, et al v. United Cntntl Holdings, Inc., et al
as 15-20331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. BRIDGEMAN and MARTIN A. BORGER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Carney v. Ford et al
as 1:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Garry Seitz Carney
Defendant:
Tony Ford, Kevin Kinnaman, Mark Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BORGER et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06453
Plaintiff:
YVETTE BORGER and ROBERT BORGER
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ingram v. Borger Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
Steven Ingram
Respondent:
Borger Police Department, Unknown Party, Hutchinson County Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Potter County DPS et al
as 2:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Steven Ingram
Defendant:
Potter County DPS, Potter County Police Department, Potter County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Potter County DPS et al
as 1:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Steven Ingram
Defendant:
Potter County DPS, Potter County Police Department, Potter County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Borger Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Steven Ingram
Defendant:
Borger Police Department, Unknown Party, Hutchinson County Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
