Cases 41 - 50 of 415
Denson v. Riley et al
as 6:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Denson
Defendant:
Marla Riley, Trevonza Bobbitt, Williams Jonathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BOBBITT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN BOBBITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Diaz
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Trevonza Bobbitt, Valderine Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bobbitt v. Hash et al
as 7:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Mark Francis Bobbitt
Defendant:
Sheriff Antonio Hash and NaphCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Hilderbrand v. Sharon Lewis, et al
as 22-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ANDREW HILDERBRAND
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON LEWIS, SHARON BROWN, EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Barber v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Rahian Amir Barber
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden T. Bobbitt, Officer Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strozier v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jamal Strozier
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Robert Toole, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
