Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Kimberly Nelson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 20-1279
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA BUCKI, Sergeant, Star #2465, CITY OF CHICAGO and ROY BOFFO, Sergeant, Star #1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY NELSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Ruiz
as 20-392
Defendant:
Robert McFall, AKA Bucky
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Ruiz, AKA Mijos
T.C. v. Maury County Government et al
as 1:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Maury County Government, Maury County Public Schools, Maury County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Jones (USA)
as 19-3105
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Anthony Marshall, AKA Ant, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA Toast, AKA Hit Man Sosa, AKA Toast and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie Jones, AKA LT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Mathes v. Burns et al
as 3:2019cv00751
Defendant:
Annie Waller Burns, John Bucky Philip and Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC
Plaintiff:
Peggy D. Mathes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Anthony Fields
as 19-3043
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Fields, also known as Bucky
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
ST. MITCHELL v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv12576
Plaintiff:
BUCKY ST. MITCHELL
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Shawn Thomas
as 19-4186
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN THOMAS, a/k/a Bucky
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Bucky's Express et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Bucky's Express and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
