Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Carl Lamont Jones v. Kelly Harrington et al
as 2:2009cv05636
Petitioner:
Carl Lamont Jones
Respondent:
Kelly Harrington and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04888
Plaintiff:
Carl A Jones, Carl A Jones and Carl A Jones
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and Accord Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
JONES v. USA
as 1:2009cv00124
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CARL PETER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Addus Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Victoria Johnson
Defendant:
Addus Healthcare Inc. and Carl Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Tony Parker
as 3:2009cv00301
Petitioner:
Carl T. Jones
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Davidson County 20th District Court
as 3:2009mc00052
Petitioner:
Carl T. Jones
Respondent:
Davidson County 20th District Court
JONES v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2008cv89483
Plaintiff:
CARL R. JONES
Defendant:
AC&S INC, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02231
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jackson, Nancy Jackson, Nancy Jackson and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Regions Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephens v. Ritter et al
as 2:2008cv00550
Plaintiff:
William Tirelli Stephens and William Tirelli Stephens
Defendant:
C Dowd Ritter, Jackson W. Moore, Allen B. Morgan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74906
Plaintiff:
CARL HENRY JONES, JR.
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
