Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Ellis v. Chandler et al
as 1:2011cv01006
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen Ellis
Defendant:
Larry Chandler and David Talley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. L'Oreal USA Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
LaKesia Chandler
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA Inc , L'Oreal USA Products Inc and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Chandler et al
as 4:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
Danny Clyde Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Jack Chandler, David Gibbons, Terry Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Chandler et al
as 1:2010cv01080
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen Ellis
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, David - Butler, David Talley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2010cv05207
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Chandler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Chandler v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2010cv04107
Plaintiff:
David W Chandler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Chandler v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2010cv05064
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Chandler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Chandler, et al v. Greenstone Ltd, et al
as 4:2004cv00915
Plaintiff:
Mary Chandler and Michael Chandler
Defendant:
Greenstone Ltd , Pharmacia & Upjohn Company , Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chandler v. Norris
as 5:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Dustin E Chandler
Defendant:
Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pender v. Marked Tree Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Brandy Pender
Defendant:
Marked Tree Arkansas, City of, Dixon Chandler, Chester Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.