Cases 41 - 50 of 267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reaves v. Medlin et al
as 4:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Jason Medlin, Richmond County School System, Daniel Hucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
DOE v. CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark County School District v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Clark County School District
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bayless v. Board of Education of the Clark County School District et al
as 2:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kermit S. Bayless
Defendant:
Board of Education of the Clark County School District, Staci Vesneske, Meg Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
