Cases 41 - 50 of 232
Fiscal Court of Anderson County et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fiscal Court of Anderson County, Fiscal Court of Bath County, Fiscal Court of Bell County and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wimbush et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis Wimbush and Cowboy Dan's Trading Post & Pawn Shop
Defendant:
Detective Carter and Oak Grove Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Union College
as 6:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Alexa Carter
Defendant:
Union College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. City of Hillview et al
as 3:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Zachary R. Miller
Defendant:
City of Hillview, Officer Christopher Seda and Lieutenant Jeff Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Hartman et al
as 5:2021cv00057
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Matt Carter and Jeffery Hartman
Plaintiff:
Shelley E. Keeling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Federal Medical Center
as 5:2021cv00048
Petitioner:
Corey L. Carter
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
