Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ralph Harold Mack, Junior v. Casa Grand Thousand Oaks, Ltd.
as 2:2017cv08231
Defendant:
Casa Grand Thousand Oaks, Ltd. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Ralpha Harold Mack, Junior
Eddards v. Casa Grande Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv03883
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Casa Grande Police Department, Unknown Mora, Unknown Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KEEN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv06156
Plaintiff:
JARED LOUIS KEEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCY, CITY OF TUCSON, CITY OF CASA GRANDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01573
Plaintiff:
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL , BANNER HEART HOSPITAL , BANNER BAYWOOD MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Animal Supply Company LLC v. Noland et al
as 2:2017cv01929
Plaintiff:
Animal Supply Company LLC
Defendant:
Timothy Noland, Unknown Noland, Pet Club Avondale LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hackman #136624 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weldon Hackman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Subodh Shroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denby et al v. Casa Grande, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
James W Denby , Elizabeth J Torres and Wilma J Logston
Defendant:
Casa Grande, City of , Pinal, County of , Francisco X Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
