Cases 41 - 50 of 7,773
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Campos et al v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Aida Esmeralda Campos, Amy O'Neill, Autumn Byars and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents a constitutionally created body corporate doing business as Arizona State University and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavez v. The Arts District Does
as 24-2739
Plaintiff:
JU AN CHAVEZ
Defendant:
THE ARTS DISTRICT DOES
Chavez v. Garland
as 24-2722
Petitioner:
GUADALUPE JOAQUIN CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Padilla et al
as 4:2024cv01621
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Yenifer Josefa Padilla doing business as Club Aguila and Lidia Lizeth Chavez doing business as Club Aguila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chavez v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21580
Plaintiff:
Sandra Chavez
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
