Cases 41 - 50 of 171
VALDEZ v. CHOE et al
as 1:2019cv17194
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and DETECTIVE DANIEL CHOE
Plaintiff:
MARVIN VALDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. CHOE et al
as 1:2019cv17195
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and DETECTIVE DANIEL CHOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03250
Plaintiff:
MICKY BROOKS, MARK GERASIMAS, RANADA LOWE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
Micky Brooks, Mark Gerasimas, Ranada Lowe and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Benjamin Laigo v. King County, et al
as 19-35517
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD RANDALL LENGYEL, Officer, GABRIALA DIEBATE, RN, PAMELA DUNDERDAL, RN and others
Defendant:
HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, TRANSPORT OFFICERS, King County Jail, KING COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN ANDREW LAIGO III
Curevo, Inc. v. Choe
as 2:2019cv00572
Defendant:
Senyon Teddy Choe
Plaintiff:
Curevo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Belt Railway Company of Chicago v. Weglarz Hotel III, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2018cv07361
Defendant:
U-Jung Choe, Weglarz Hotel IV, L.L.C., Katie Papadimitriu and others
Plaintiff:
The Belt Railway Company of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chun Choe v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 18-56175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHUN CHOE, AKA Marc Choe
Defendant - Appellant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
PERLA FLORES v. KAJ CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv01891
Defendant:
ALEX CHOE, KWI HWA CHOE, JUSTIN CHOE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCA PERLA FLORES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Todora-Choe Ventures II, LLC v. PEAQ Labs Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Todora-Choe Ventures II, LLC
Defendant:
PEAQ Labs Inc. and Gerome Sapp
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
