Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Oden v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv08060
Petitioner:
Christopher Earl Oden
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gladys v. Davenport et al
as 1:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gladys
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Vincent Norman, Chris Quarles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Clarke
as 3:2016cv00200
Petitioner:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strunk v. Druskin et al
as 1:2015cv06817
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant:
Robert Druskin, John Koskinen, Jacob Joseph Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Strunk, et al v. DOS, et al
as 14-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk and Harold W. Van Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Christopher Cottrell v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EARL COTTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Department of Corrections, EDDIE PEARSON, Former Warden of Sussex I Prison, VDOC, DAVID EVERETT, Regional Director, Eastern Office, VDOC and others
STRUNK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK and HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oliver v. Earl et al
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Christopher Earl, Deputy Warden Miles, Warden Hetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
