Cases 41 - 50 of 163
Sullivan v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jason Russell Sullivan
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte, FNU Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aylward v. City of Charlotte et al.
as 3:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Dr. ilonka aylward and Ilonka Aylward
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, City of Charlotte, Charlotte Stormwater Services and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Govens v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2021cv00192
Defendant:
Wayne Goode and City of Charlotte
Plaintiff:
James Govens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00675
Defendant:
Jane Doe, City of Charlotte, William Todd Walther and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdullah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
Arroyo v. Lyles et al
as 3:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Court of Administration of Mecklenburg County, Spencer Merriweather, Mecklenburg County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hensley v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2020cv00482
Plaintiff:
Johnathan S. Hensley
Defendant:
City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benham v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 3:2020cv00459
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, North Carolina and Jeffrey J Joseph
Plaintiff:
Philip Benham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattley v. City of Charlotte, et al.
as 3:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
Dana C Wattley and Dana C. Wattley
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, FNU Peacock and FNU Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English Construction Company, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2020cv00346
Defendant:
City of Charlotte
Plaintiff:
English Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
