Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Jones v. State of Alabama Pardon and Parole Board (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dale Jones
Defendant:
State of Alabama Pardon and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03602
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones , Dale Jones, Sr. , Maxine Miller and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Jeffery Zmuda, et al
as 10-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY D. ZMUDA, BRENT REINKE, PAM SONNEN and others
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Zmuda et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Jefferey D Zmuda, Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Somers v. Clayton, Township of et al
as 2:2010cv11123
Plaintiff:
Susan Caroline Somers
Defendant:
Clayton, Township of , Clayton Township Police Department , Dale Jones and others
American Casualty Company of Reading, PA v. Jones
as 3:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
American Casualty Company of Reading, PA
Defendant:
Jon Dale Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Kenneth Jones v. J. Sullivan
as 09-55166
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DALE JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
J. SULLIVAN, Warden
Kenneth Dale Jones v. J Sullivan
as 5:2003cv01482
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dale Jones
Respondent:
J Sullivan, -
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Tyrone Jones, II
as 08-2484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TYRONE DALE JONES, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
