Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Daryl Smith v. USA, et al
as 10-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GREGORY HUSTON and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF PRISONS
Daryl Smith v. USA, et al
as 10-5076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GREGORY HUSTON and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF PRISONS
Smith v. Doris, et al
as 09-2480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYLE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DORIS, PLYMOUTH COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CRIMINAL HISTORY BOARD and others
Smith v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2009cv02589
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Doris et al
as 1:2009cv10916
Plaintiff:
Daryle Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen Doris, Plymouth County Police Department, Criminal History Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02327
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv02791
Plaintiff:
Daryl Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Director Bureau of Prison and Gregory Huston
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sunbridge Capital, Inc. v. Lumsden et al
as 1:2008cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sunbridge Capital, Inc., Sunbridge Capital, Inc. and Sunbridge Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Leon Lumsden, Daryl Smith, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SMITH v. UNITED STATES CLERK OF COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE et al
as 1:2007cv01767
Plaintiff:
DARYL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CLERK OF COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE and CHRIS SOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
