Cases 41 - 50 of 296
Dean v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Dean
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagler v. USA
as 1:2022cv00303
Petitioner:
Cody Dean Hagler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ball, Jr. v. Matt Tortorici et al
as 2:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
Matt Tortorici, Andra B. Walls, E. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dean v. The United States Of America
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Robert David Dean
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Scott v. Yelder et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Royal Dean Scott
Defendant:
Traves Yelder and T. Weary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson, James William S. Jones, Arthur Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sicking et al v. Kapsalis et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Dean Sicking and Sicking Safety Systems LLC
Defendant:
Marc Kapsalis and Zikap Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Kapsalis v. Sicking
as 2:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Marc Kapsalis
Defendant:
Dean Sicking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Shea et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Raymond Edward Shea, Pauline D. Shea, USA Health University Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Nute v. White et al
as 4:2021cv01563
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Nute
Defendant:
Bryant Dean White and Lucas G Yarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
