Cases 41 - 50 of 239
Hicks et al v. Direct Hit Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ellen Hicks and Jamie Sherman
Defendant:
Direct Hit Logistics, Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kotecki v. DCD Delivery, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv06653
Plaintiff:
LUKAS KOTECKI
Defendant:
DCD Delivery, Inc., DHL Express (USA) Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Taylor v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 0:2021cv62376
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Taylor v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 1:2021cv24079
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bunnell v. MBM Delivery and Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Todd Bunnell
Defendant:
MBM Delivery and Logistics, LLC, DHL Express (USA) Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reitzi v. Vans Express Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01514
Plaintiff:
Patricia Reitzi
Defendant:
Vans Express Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Krystal Walker v. Global Mail, Inc.
as 2:2021cv06546
Plaintiff:
Krystal Walker
Defendant:
Global Mail, Inc. dba DHL eCOMMERCE, DHL Express USA Inc a corporation doing business as DHL Ecommerce Erroneously Sued As Global Mail Inc, Does 1 to 50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
