Cases 41 - 50 of 232
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Westly Daniel Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05203
Plaintiff:
Danielle Brown
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01866
Plaintiff:
Danielle M Browne and Danielle Browne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Eckert-Smith v. Oasis Midstream Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv01774
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Eckert-Smith
Defendant:
Oasis Midstream Partners LP, Daniel Brown, Matthew Fitzgerald and others
Mays v. Oasis Midstream Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv10766
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Mays
Defendant:
Oasis Midstream Partners LP, Daniel Brown, Matthew Fitzgerald and others
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04515
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Great Neck Park District
as 2:2021cv05484
Plaintiff:
Danielle Brown
Defendant:
Great Neck Park District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Misty Brown v. Megan Brennan
as 21-16154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MISTY DANIELLE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General
Brown v. Maher et al
as 5:2021cv01018
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown
Defendant:
Brian P Maher, John Snyder and Margaret Montfort-Balfour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
