Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Marshall v. Jayne et al
as 6:2012cv06127
Plaintiff:
Deatrick Marshall
Defendant:
Paul E. Jayne, Ronald H. Kennell, P. Mastrantonio, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIMBERLAKE v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2012cv00022
Defendant:
DENNIS BYRD, MICHAEL DEATRICK, JAMES GOLDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS TIMBERLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation
as CAN/3:12-cv-01055
Plaintiff:
Ella Deatrick
Defendant:
Science Applications International Corporation
Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation
as 3:2012cv01055
Plaintiff:
Ella Deatrick
Defendant:
Science Applications International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEARMAN v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00123
Defendant:
MIKE DEATRICK, HARRISON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEE STEARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BALD v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00053
Defendant:
ZACHARIAH NATHAN ADAMS, SHEILA BARBER, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN BALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIPPEY et al v. DEATRICK et al
as 4:2011cv00044
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NATHAN WAYNE BANET, MIKE DEATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CRYSTAL THOMPSON and JOHANNA RIPPEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolden v. Ft. Myers Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Deatrick Sean Bolden
Defendant:
Ft. Myers Police Department, City of Ft. Myers, Lee County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
