Cases 41 - 50 of 2,109
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Enstrom et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Betsy Enstrom, John Stana, Kevin Arias-Watkins and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., The Board of Directors of SAS Institute, Inc., The Retirement Committee of SAS Institute Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
