Cases 41 - 50 of 2,006
Allen v. Wolf Partners LLC
as 3:2023cv01696
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E Allen
Defendant:
Wolf Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Judge Alvis et al
as 2:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Adams, Jr
Defendant:
Judge Alvis and Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neville v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
William Neville
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and E&C's Snacks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Regassa v. Kimberley et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
M Kimberley, E Johnson, V Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burns et al v. Meta Platforms Inc
as 2:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Steven Burns, Charmaine Starnes, Sandra K Garrison and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stackhouse v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
James E. Stackhouse
Defendant:
Tony Hamm and Geneva County Commission and Surety Bond Holders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Payne (Inmate 3)
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Andrew E. McNeal
Defendant:
Sgt Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
