Cases 41 - 50 of 290
v. Application for Order for International Judicial Assistance; Matter of Operadora Hotelera Los Arcos del Cabo, S.A. de C.V. v. Seguros Inbursa, S.A. de C.V., et al., Ref. No. EUA01840
as 3:2022mc80241
In Re:
Application for Order for International Judicial Assistance; Matter of Operadora Hotelera Los Arcos del Cabo, S.A. de C.V. v. Seguros Inbursa, S.A. de C.V., et al., Ref. No. EUA01840
Hinds, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv04730
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hinds, et al., Deborah Hinds, Michael Hawkins and others
Defendant:
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Apotex Corp., ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Valerie Vig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al
as 5:2018md02834
Defendant:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al, Airbnb, Inc., Stitchfix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bonilla v. Federal Bureau of Investigation , et al. et al
as 4:2022cv02776
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., William E. Smith, Quentin L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Dudek and Associates et al.
as 3:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Simone Ruffin
Defendant:
Dudek and Associates et al. and TekSystems Global Services, LLC
Cross Defendant:
TekSystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sh Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor:
Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent:
William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified:
Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party:
Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court:
Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae:
City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. One British Aerospace BAE125 Series 800A Aircraft Bearing Registration Number N716BB, ET AL
as 2:2020cv06321
Defendant:
ONE BRITISH AEROSPACE BAE 125 SERIES 800A AIRCRAFT BEARING REGISTRATION NUMBER N716BB, ET AL and One British Aerospace BAE125 Series 800A Aircraft Bearing Registration Number N716BB
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Secured Capital Partners, LLC, Beverly Hills Exotic Collection LLC, Victor Franco Noval and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
