Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09105
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCHOEN et al v. DUFFY et al
as 1:2026cv02559
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH SCHOEN and NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
Defendant:
SEAN DUFFY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Carpenter v. Landry et al
as 3:2026cv00791
Plaintiff:
Charles Curtis Carpenter
Defendant:
Nancy Landry, Sherri Wharton Hadskey, Elizabeth B. Murrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Medical Protective Company v. Donald Gronbeck, et al
as 26-3646
Plaintiff:
THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
DONALD ALEXZANDER GRONBECK, YELLOW SPRINGS PRIMARY CARE, INC., ELIZABETH BREWINGTON and others
Morell v. Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corp.
as 3:2026cv02387
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Morell
Defendant:
Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corp and Jeremy Roper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.